GPON vs. Traditional Ethernet Architecture

January 20, 2020
4 min read

OrhanErgun

GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network) is used to reduce the number of active switching nodes in the network design. Network Design Best practice in Campus networks and many Datacenter networks (Not Massively Scale Datacenters), is to use Three-Tier; Access, Distribution and Core network design. Although the design decision depends on the scalability requirements in the Campus and DC, two layer; Access and Collapsed Distribution/Core design can be used. Below figure depicts common three tier Access, Distribution and Core design.

This post was first published on Service Provider Networks Design and Architecture by Orhan Ergun book.

Figure - GPON vs. Traditional Ethernet Architecture

In Three-tier Traditional campus networks, there are active Ethernet devices used in each tier. Active means, nodes require electricity. Active Ethernet switches forward traffic based on forwarding rules. If it's a Layer 2 network, traffic is forwarded based on Layer 2 information, if it is a Layer 3 design, traffic is forwarded based on routing protocol information.

GPON in the campus network replaces traditional three-tier design with two-tier optical network, by removing the Active access and distribution layer Ethernet switches with the ONT, Splitter and OLT devices. Although ONT requires power, the power requirement of ONT, compared to ActiveEthernet switch is much less and the Splitter doesn't require power at all. Splitter is purely a non- Active device.

Analysis show that using GPON in the Campus network, instead of Active devices, reduces power requirement significantly.

Many capabilities which are provided by Active Ethernet switches, such as Vlan awareness, Security features, Quality of service, Multicast, Redundancy, loop prevention etc. are provided with GPON design as well.

In design, there is no best solution. Every solution has its advantages and the disadvantages. This is also true for the comparison between GPON vs. Active Ethernet.

So far, it has been given that GPON has many advantages. On the other side, GPON has its bandwidth limitation as a technology. 2.5Gbps Download, 1.25Gbps Upload limitation. Although with the newer generation of PON solution, it can provide more Download and Upload bandwidth.

When we compare GPON with Traditional Active Ethernet, it is true that the Download bandwidth is 2.5Gbps and Upload bandwidth is 1.25Gbps, which is less than what traditional Ethernet can provide.

Depending on the Split ratio on the Splitter, 2.5Gbps bandwidth might be shared with 32, 64 or even with 128 different end points. Thus, it is true to say that when there is more bandwidth requirement per end point, Active Ethernet architecture can provide more bandwidth, probably with a better cost.

Cost analysis should be made carefully, as there might be different Fiber optic cable and transceiver requirements for each solution.

OrhanErgun

About the Author

OrhanErgun

He created OrhanErgun.Net 10 years ago and has been serving the IT industry with his renowned and awarded training.

Wrote many books, mostly on Network Design, joined many IETF RFCs, gave Public talks at many Forums, and mentored thousands of his students.  

Today, with his carefully selected instructors, OrhanErgun.Net is providing IT courses to tens of thousands of IT engineers.

Share this Article

Related Articles

Basic NetworkingAugust 22, 2024

Understanding Route Leaking Between VRFs in Cisco Routers

Understanding Route Leaking Between VRFs in Cisco Routers Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) technology is a pivotal feature in the realm of network routers, allowing the segmentation of network paths...

Read Article
Basic NetworkingAugust 22, 2024

Troubleshooting Common Cisco VRF Issues: Expert Tips and Solutions

Troubleshooting Common Cisco VRF Issues: Expert Tips and Solutions In the world of complex network designs, Cisco Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) stands out as a robust technology enhancing security...

Read Article
Basic NetworkingAugust 22, 2024

Cisco VRF vs. MPLS: Navigating the Differences

Cisco VRF vs. MPLS: Navigating the Differences In the vast landscape of network technology, understanding the nuances between different solutions is crucial for optimizing and securing a network. Cisco's Virtual...

Read Article
Basic NetworkingAugust 22, 2024

How to Configure VRF on Cisco Routers: Step-by-Step Tutorial

Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) is a technology that allows multiple instances of a routing table to coexist within the same router at the same time. It lets you segment...

Read Article
Basic NetworkingAugust 22, 2024

Optimizing Your Network with Cisco VRF: Best Practices

Optimizing Your Network with Cisco VRF: Best Practices Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) is an essential technology in network design, particularly for organizations that require segmenting network traffic for security,...

Read Article
Basic NetworkingJune 4, 2024

Infoblox NIOS Expert: A Comprehensive Guide

Infoblox NIOS Expert: A Comprehensive Guide As networking environments become increasingly complex, the demand for sophisticated tools to manage these systems rises significantly. Infoblox Network Identity Operating System (NIOS) is...

Read Article

Subscribe for Exclusive Deals & Promotions

Stay informed about special discounts, limited-time offers, and promotional campaigns. Be the first to know when we launch new deals!