QoS Models: Let's Identify and Compare Them

In recent years, Quality of Service (QoS) models have become increasingly important in networking. QoS models allow network administrators to identify and prioritize different types of traffic, ensuring that critical data is always delivered promptly and reliably.

In this blog post, we'll take a look at some of the most common quality of service models used in networking. We'll compare and contrast these models, and we'll discuss their benefits and drawbacks. By understanding the different QoS models available, network administrators can make more informed decisions about which model is best for their specific needs.

Let's Start with the Basics: What Are QoS Models?

When it comes to networking and communication, Quality of Service (QoS) models act as a framework for ensuring that data transmission meets specific requirements. These models prioritize certain types of network traffic and can even perform bandwidth allocation to guarantee efficient operation. QoS models are essential in industries where reliable communication is crucial, such as healthcare or finance.

Within a QoS model, both hardware and software components work together to provide the necessary support for network functions. Different QoS models include differentiated services, integrated services, and best-effort services. Each model offers unique benefits and may be more suitable for particular applications or networks.

Different QoS Models:

When setting up a network, Quality of Service (QoS) models can be utilized to prioritize and manage different types of network traffic. There are three main QoS models: best effort, integrated services, and differentiated services. Let's talk about these three main QoS models and compare them to each other.

1. Best-Effort Services:

When it comes to QoS models, "best effort" is often misunderstood as meaning no effort at all. However, this term actually refers to the priority system in which services are provided on a first-come, first-serve basis. While this model may not prioritize certain types of traffic over others, it can still provide a reliable level of service.

Additionally, this approach allows for maximum network efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In some cases, best effort may be the best choice for delivering quality service. It all depends on the specific needs and priorities of the network in question.

2. Integrated Services (IntServ):

The Integrated Service (IntServ) approach is a QoS model that allows for individualized treatment of network traffic. It utilizes service-specific reservation protocols to reserve resources for particular data flows. This approach can accurately predict and guarantee defined performance levels, but it is not scalable and requires more administrative control than other QoS models, such as DiffServ.

IntServ was developed as part of the recent efforts to meet the increased demand for real-time applications, such as voice and video conferencing, but it has been largely replaced by DiffServ in modern networks due to its limited scalability. However, IntServ may still be utilized in service provider networks for specific high-priority services.

3. Differentiated Services (DiffServ):

Differentiated Services, or DiffServ, is a Quality of Service (QoS) model that allows network traffic to be managed and prioritized based on predetermined criteria. This can include factors such as the type of data being transmitted or the source of the transmission. DiffServ uses "traffic conditioning" techniques, such as marking and policing, to ensure that certain types of traffic receive the appropriate level of service.

In contrast to other QoS models, DiffServ can handle a larger number of classes with relatively simple configurations. However, its effectiveness relies on proper implementation and adherence to agreed-upon standards.

Comparing Different QoS Models

When it comes to internet traffic management, there are a few different approaches. The best effort approach treats all traffic the same, without prioritizing any particular type.

IntServ, on the other hand, prioritizes certain types of traffic by reserving network resources for specific connections.

DiffServ takes it one step further by categorizing traffic into different "classes" and giving each class a certain level of priority.

While best effort is the simplest approach, it can lead to slower speed and less reliable connections for some users. In contrast, both IntServ and DiffServ offer more customized and efficient handling of internet traffic. However, they require more sophisticated networking equipment and can be more costly to implement and maintain.

Ultimately, the best option depends on the specific needs and resources of an individual or organization.

Final Words

We’ve looked at four different QoS models and their applicability in various situations. By understanding the different strengths and weaknesses of each model, we can more easily select the right one for our specific needs.

Created by
Stanley Avery

I am a certified network engineer with over 10 years of experience in the field. I have a deep understanding of networking and IT security, and I am always looking for new challenges.

View profile

Daniel Lardeux
Daniel Lardeux Senior Network Consultant at Post Telecom

I passed the CCDE Practical exam and Orhan’s CCDE course was very important contributor to my success. I attended the CCDE course of Orhan Ergun in July and it was exactly what I needed, Orhan is taking the pain to break down the different technologies.

Roy Lexmond
Roy Lexmond Senior Network Designer at Routz CCDE #20150017 & CCIE R&S; #26557

After I attended Orhan Ergun’s CCDE course I passed the CCDE practical exam.I really enjoyed the course a lot ...

Nicholas Russo
Nicholas Russo Network Consulting Engineer (CCDE/CCIEx2), Cisc

I signed up for Orhan’s CCDE training. This training is very technically detailed and the use-cases, quizzes, scenarios, and mind maps are all great resources in the overall training program. Orhan teaches his students to think like a network designer ...

Slide Heading
Slide Heading Network Systems Engineer at Conscia A/S CCIE #42544 (SP) & CCDE #20160015

Orhan is forcing you to take off the implementation hat that most of us have been wearing for many years, instead he is providing a new fancy design hat, which makes you see and deal with the issues presented ...

Kim Pedersen
Kim Pedersen CCIE in RS and SP (#29189) CCDE#20170021

I’ve used Orhan’s self-paced CCDE training material. If you are interested in knowing how all the technologies go together in a coherent design i can highly recommend it.I also enjoyed the Quizzes which helped pick out my weak spots in selecting ...

Laurent Metzger
Laurent Metzger 3xCCIE/CCDE Senior Network Architect

Hi Orhan. I passed the CCDE exam on February 22. I read everything that you put on your Self Paced CCDE Training course and it was very helpful in my success. Thank you very much.

Martin J. Duggan
Martin J. Duggan Network Architect at AT&T;, Ciscopress Author CCDE #20160006 & CCIE#7942

I attended Orhan’s April 201610 days CCDE Bootcamp. I am CCDE now !

You can tell Orhan has a great deal of experience, it really comes through when he presents his design case studies and the CCDE Practical scenarios.

Muhammad Abubakar
Muhammad Abubakar Lead Network Architect – CCDE #20160016 2xCCIE #26693 2xJNCIE VCIX

Your excellent CCDE materials and amazing Bootcamp helped me tremendously through my learning journey.Also thank you very much for being available whenever I have a design question or a complex design topics. I can’t compare your design skills ...

Jennifer Pai
Jennifer Pai Network/Security Engineer at KNET Technology

Thanks Orhan very much for this course. It helped strengthen my “Network design mind”.

Ruslan Silyayev
Ruslan Silyayev Solution Architect at R.I.S.K Company

Training by Orhan is not a CCDE preperation training only. It will be useful for engineers which are dealing with design. You want to pass CCDE exam or learn network design, then don’t look at anywhere else!

Sameer Meher
Sameer Meher Solutions Architect at 23 Wards/Japan

Orhan Ergun’s CCDE course was really very good. CCDE Level Intelligence was delivered very well and with very useful case studies and the scenarios, I am thankful to Orhan for all his help!

Ken Young
Ken Young Senior Technical Architect Province of Nova Scotia, 2xCCIE #41597 | CCDE #20170047

If anyone wants to understand network design and architecture, also pass CCDE exam , I recommend you to attend Orhan’s online courses! I am a CCDE now but learning is a journey, we will be together in your other courses too Orhan!

Matt Cross
Matt Cross Technical Architect at Heartland – CCDE #2019::7

Orhan did an excellent job of filling in the gaps of knowledge that I had that took me to the finish line of the practical exam CCDE. The community of people that Orhan facilitates are both engaging and supportive of the journey to CCDE. Orhan ...

Shiling Ding
Shiling Ding Sentinel Technologies – CCDE #2019::12

Just passed the CCDE Practical exam! I attended Orhan Ergun’s CCDE training program , used Orhan’s Instructor Led and Self-Paced CCDE training and Online CCDE Practical Scenarios during my CCDE journey. Orhan’s CCDE In Depth book is an excellent summary ...

Abelardo Basurto
Abelardo Basurto Solutions Architect at Cisco Systems – CCDE 2018::6

Hi everyone, I’ve just passed the CCDE Exam. My Number is CCDE 2018::6 I attended to Online CCDE Bootcamp of Orhan. I want to thank Orhan not only for the great book and bootcamp, but also for his commitment, availability and willingness to assist the ...

Hady Mohamed Abdellah
Hady Mohamed Abdellah Network Architect Hamad International Airport Qatar – CCDE 2018::1

Hi guys, I’m so happy that I passed the exam. I’ve already got my number CCDE 2018::1. Thanks to Orhan for being the best CCDE instructor in the world. I highly recomend Orhan’s CCDE Training and In-Depth-CCDE ...

Bryan Bartik
Bryan Bartik Sr. Systems Engineer at CompuNet – CCDE 20170059

Hi Orhan I passed CCDE Practical exam on November 2017 ! I really enjoyed your materials and quizzes and use cases. They were definitely helpful in my preparation. Thanks a lot !

Giedrius Trapkauskas
Giedrius Trapkauskas Network Solutions Architect at Liberty Global – CCDE 20180004

I attended Orhan’s CCDE Training in Istanbul and it was very helpful in my preparation. I passed the exam recently and I want to say Thank you Orhan! For those who want to pass the CCDE exam, definitely start with ...

Alaa Issa
Alaa Issa Sr.Solutions Architect – CCDE#20180033 3xCCIE ( Collab|DC|Security )#27146

I registered to Orhan’s training in Feb 2017. From that time, I attended Orhan’s training several times. The depth of knowledge which Orhan has is amazing, and how to present such consistent knowledge to the ...

Mazin Ahsan Design Lead Engineer | Solutions Engineer | CCDE License # 20160030 | CCIE Licence # 23892

I passed the CCDE Practical Lab exam on November 17,2016 from supplications of elders and dedication from my Sensei Mr. Orhan Ergun I took different CCDE bootcamps in the past. Orhan has the most depth and expertise ...

Jeff Patterson CCDE# 2018::11

Hi Orhan I wanted to pass along my appreciation for the outstanding training material. I used the online CCDE training provided by Orhan as well as the In-Depth-CCDE book and passed the exam in February 2018. Thank you Orhan!

Mehdi Sfar
Mehdi Sfar Network and Security Architect / CCDE #20210003 | CCIE R&S; #51583

I signed up for Orhan’s CCDE Self paced Course. This course, along with the CCDE In Depth book, helped me for my CCDE Practical as well as Written exams. It pushed me to ask the "WHY" questions and allowed ...

Related courses