Unicast Multicast Broadcast Anycast and Incast Traffic Types

Unicast Multicast Broadcast Anycast and Incast Traffic Types will be explained in this post. Traffic flow/traffic types are important information that needs to be considered in Network Design, thus understanding each one of them by every IT Engineer is critical and Important for Application requirements, Security, and Performance of the overall system.

In this blog post, Unicast, Multicast, Broadcast, and Anycast traffic types/patterns will be explained with examples and the topologies.

Unicast Traffic Flow

Unicast traffic type is a point-to-point communication type. Usually from a scalability perspective, Unicast is not the desired traffic type. But if there are only two points that communicate with each other, Unicast is an optimal choice.

Multicast Traffic Flow

Point to Multipoint or Multi-Point to Multi-Point Traffic type. If the communication is targeted to a group of recipients, then the Multicast traffic type is more suitable. Multicast source/sender, receivers, and multicast groups are the components of Multicast communication. A classical example is IPTV - IP Television. One multicast group is assigned for each IPTV channel and only interested receivers get the stream.

Broadcast Traffic Flow

If traffic is sent to everyone, regardless of considering if there is an uninterested receiver, then it is a broadcast traffic type. ARP traffic is a classical example of Broadcast traffic type. ARP - Address Resolution Protocol packets are sent to the broadcast address and every receiver has to process it, even if the packet is not targeted for them. If there are many uninterested receivers, Broadcast traffic is considered inefficient.

Anycast Traffic Flow

Anycast is a way of deploying an IP address. The same IP with the same subnet mask is assigned to multiple devices and whichever other devices need to communicate with this IP address, send the traffic to the topologically (IGP/BGP cost) closest point. Classical examples are, Anycast DNS such as Google DNS or Multicast Anycast RP (Rendezvous Point).

Incast Traffic Flow

If the traffic type is Multipoint to Point, it is called Incast. Big Data type of traffic requires many servers to process the same data and send the output to another engine. So multiple servers compute the information and send it to the receiver at once. Network design is so critical as there might be bottlenecks easily in this type of traffic.

Unicast vs Multicast

The difference between unicast and multicast, as mentioned before, if there are multiple receivers, sending traffic as unicast would be inefficient. If the packet is sent only once from the source, and the network can replicate it, less effort is spent on the source, and less bandwidth is used on the network. Let's have. a look at the below example:

There is one sender/source but 3 receivers, so in Unicast's case, the same data needs to be sent 3 times. In Multicast communication, the sender/source sends the data only 1 time, network devices replicate the traffic, and 3 receivers get the same data. Obviously, this is more optimal for the sender and network resources, because of less resource usage. These resources usually are CPU, Memory, and Network Bandwidth.

Multicast vs Anycast

Multicast traffic is sent to many receivers at the same time. So, the source/sender sends one copy and it can be sent to hundreds, if not thousands of receivers, and all receivers get it. Anycast on the other side, one copy is sent and there is one receiver as well. But if that receiver fails, there is another receiver with the same IP and same subnet mask in the network and it receives it. So, with anycast target/receiver is always more than one. In the Google DNS case, with the same IP address, there are tens of DNS servers around the world. If traffic comes from France, the France DNS server replies, if it comes from London, London DNS replies, and so on. Closest receiver/target replies.

Multicast vs Broadcast

An important difference between Multicast and Broadcast is, that with Multicast we send the traffic to the interested receivers. With broadcast we don't care if there is interested people or not, it is sent everywhere continuously. There is Multicast PIM Dense mode, for example, you might compare it with Broadcast. They can be seen as similar but they are not. With PIM Dense, we send the traffic everywhere initially but if there are no interested receivers at the same Multicast enabled locations, the sender stops sending to those locations because the sender receives Multicast Prune messages. With broadcast, no Prune mechanism, thus traffic is sent continuously even if there is no interested receiver.

Unicast vs Multicast vs Broadcast vs Anycast

When you see this comparison again, just remember, if it is only two-party for communication, Unicast is an optimal choice. If there are multiple, look at if some of them are interested to hear some discussion, others might be interested in other discussions, then Multicast is the best. If there is only one type of discussion and everyone should receive it, the broadcast is the optimal choice. Let's say a group of people in a party some of them talk about politics, other groups of people discuss religion, and so on. So this is Multicast communication. But if someone in that party loudly starts shouting and everyone has to hear even if they are uninterested, he is broadcasting. In a summary: Unicast is one-to-one, Multicast is One to Many, Broadcast is One to All, Anycast is One to Any and Incast is Many to One communication models.


Source: www.researchgate.com


Created by
Orhan Ergun

Orhan Ergun, CCIE/CCDE Trainer, Author of Many Networking Books, Network Design Advisor, and Cisco Champion 2019/2020/2021

He created OrhanErgun.Net 10 years ago and has been serving the IT industry with his renowned and awarded training.

Wrote many books, mostly on Network Design, joined many IETF RFCs, gave Public talks at many Forums, and mentored thousands of his students.  

Today, with his carefully selected instructors, OrhanErgun.Net is providing IT courses to tens of thousands of IT engineers. 

View profile

Daniel Lardeux
Daniel Lardeux Senior Network Consultant at Post Telecom

I passed the CCDE Practical exam and Orhan’s CCDE course was very important contributor to my success. I attended the CCDE course of Orhan Ergun in July and it was exactly what I needed, Orhan is taking the pain to break down the different technologies.

Roy Lexmond
Roy Lexmond Senior Network Designer at Routz CCDE #20150017 & CCIE R&S; #26557

After I attended Orhan Ergun’s CCDE course I passed the CCDE practical exam.I really enjoyed the course a lot ...

Nicholas Russo
Nicholas Russo Network Consulting Engineer (CCDE/CCIEx2), Cisc

I signed up for Orhan’s CCDE training. This training is very technically detailed and the use-cases, quizzes, scenarios, and mind maps are all great resources in the overall training program. Orhan teaches his students to think like a network designer ...

Slide Heading
Slide Heading Network Systems Engineer at Conscia A/S CCIE #42544 (SP) & CCDE #20160015

Orhan is forcing you to take off the implementation hat that most of us have been wearing for many years, instead he is providing a new fancy design hat, which makes you see and deal with the issues presented ...

Kim Pedersen
Kim Pedersen CCIE in RS and SP (#29189) CCDE#20170021

I’ve used Orhan’s self-paced CCDE training material. If you are interested in knowing how all the technologies go together in a coherent design i can highly recommend it.I also enjoyed the Quizzes which helped pick out my weak spots in selecting ...

Laurent Metzger
Laurent Metzger 3xCCIE/CCDE Senior Network Architect

Hi Orhan. I passed the CCDE exam on February 22. I read everything that you put on your Self Paced CCDE Training course and it was very helpful in my success. Thank you very much.

Martin J. Duggan
Martin J. Duggan Network Architect at AT&T;, Ciscopress Author CCDE #20160006 & CCIE#7942

I attended Orhan’s April 201610 days CCDE Bootcamp. I am CCDE now !

You can tell Orhan has a great deal of experience, it really comes through when he presents his design case studies and the CCDE Practical scenarios.

Muhammad Abubakar
Muhammad Abubakar Lead Network Architect – CCDE #20160016 2xCCIE #26693 2xJNCIE VCIX

Your excellent CCDE materials and amazing Bootcamp helped me tremendously through my learning journey.Also thank you very much for being available whenever I have a design question or a complex design topics. I can’t compare your design skills ...

Jennifer Pai
Jennifer Pai Network/Security Engineer at KNET Technology

Thanks Orhan very much for this course. It helped strengthen my “Network design mind”.

Ruslan Silyayev
Ruslan Silyayev Solution Architect at R.I.S.K Company

Training by Orhan is not a CCDE preperation training only. It will be useful for engineers which are dealing with design. You want to pass CCDE exam or learn network design, then don’t look at anywhere else!

Sameer Meher
Sameer Meher Solutions Architect at 23 Wards/Japan

Orhan Ergun’s CCDE course was really very good. CCDE Level Intelligence was delivered very well and with very useful case studies and the scenarios, I am thankful to Orhan for all his help!

Ken Young
Ken Young Senior Technical Architect Province of Nova Scotia, 2xCCIE #41597 | CCDE #20170047

If anyone wants to understand network design and architecture, also pass CCDE exam , I recommend you to attend Orhan’s online courses! I am a CCDE now but learning is a journey, we will be together in your other courses too Orhan!

Matt Cross
Matt Cross Technical Architect at Heartland – CCDE #2019::7

Orhan did an excellent job of filling in the gaps of knowledge that I had that took me to the finish line of the practical exam CCDE. The community of people that Orhan facilitates are both engaging and supportive of the journey to CCDE. Orhan ...

Shiling Ding
Shiling Ding Sentinel Technologies – CCDE #2019::12

Just passed the CCDE Practical exam! I attended Orhan Ergun’s CCDE training program , used Orhan’s Instructor Led and Self-Paced CCDE training and Online CCDE Practical Scenarios during my CCDE journey. Orhan’s CCDE In Depth book is an excellent summary ...

Abelardo Basurto
Abelardo Basurto Solutions Architect at Cisco Systems – CCDE 2018::6

Hi everyone, I’ve just passed the CCDE Exam. My Number is CCDE 2018::6 I attended to Online CCDE Bootcamp of Orhan. I want to thank Orhan not only for the great book and bootcamp, but also for his commitment, availability and willingness to assist the ...

Hady Mohamed Abdellah
Hady Mohamed Abdellah Network Architect Hamad International Airport Qatar – CCDE 2018::1

Hi guys, I’m so happy that I passed the exam. I’ve already got my number CCDE 2018::1. Thanks to Orhan for being the best CCDE instructor in the world. I highly recomend Orhan’s CCDE Training and In-Depth-CCDE ...

Bryan Bartik
Bryan Bartik Sr. Systems Engineer at CompuNet – CCDE 20170059

Hi Orhan I passed CCDE Practical exam on November 2017 ! I really enjoyed your materials and quizzes and use cases. They were definitely helpful in my preparation. Thanks a lot !

Giedrius Trapkauskas
Giedrius Trapkauskas Network Solutions Architect at Liberty Global – CCDE 20180004

I attended Orhan’s CCDE Training in Istanbul and it was very helpful in my preparation. I passed the exam recently and I want to say Thank you Orhan! For those who want to pass the CCDE exam, definitely start with ...

Alaa Issa
Alaa Issa Sr.Solutions Architect – CCDE#20180033 3xCCIE ( Collab|DC|Security )#27146

I registered to Orhan’s training in Feb 2017. From that time, I attended Orhan’s training several times. The depth of knowledge which Orhan has is amazing, and how to present such consistent knowledge to the ...

Mazin Ahsan Design Lead Engineer | Solutions Engineer | CCDE License # 20160030 | CCIE Licence # 23892

I passed the CCDE Practical Lab exam on November 17,2016 from supplications of elders and dedication from my Sensei Mr. Orhan Ergun I took different CCDE bootcamps in the past. Orhan has the most depth and expertise ...

Jeff Patterson CCDE# 2018::11

Hi Orhan I wanted to pass along my appreciation for the outstanding training material. I used the online CCDE training provided by Orhan as well as the In-Depth-CCDE book and passed the exam in February 2018. Thank you Orhan!

Mehdi Sfar
Mehdi Sfar Network and Security Architect / CCDE #20210003 | CCIE R&S; #51583

I signed up for Orhan’s CCDE Self paced Course. This course, along with the CCDE In Depth book, helped me for my CCDE Practical as well as Written exams. It pushed me to ask the "WHY" questions and allowed ...

Related courses

Cisco CCDE v3 Training

71:39:34 Hours
225 Lectures


CCIE Enterprise Infrastructure Training

117:12:56 Hours
287 Lectures


Cisco CCNP ENCOR 350 - 401 Training

41:36:12 Hours
137 Lectures